
這篇筆記:工作題的論點大家都想得到,差別在推得夠不夠深。這篇整理工作與職涯常考的題目、8 條邏輯鏈(滿意度、穩定性、自僱、工時、競爭合作),拆解我四篇工作題作文從 6 分到 7.5 分的段落差異。
✦ 這篇筆記帶你看

工作題是我送批改時分數跨度最大的主題:最低的一篇 6 分(接受困境還是改善),最高的一篇 7.5 分(競爭還是合作)。兩篇都是 Discuss both views,論點也都不難,差別在於段落有沒有守住自己要講的那一邊,以及每個理由有沒有推到結果。
工作題的單字(tenure、remuneration、work–life balance 這些)在主題單字(上)已經整理過。這篇往下挖一層:工作題到底在考什麼、論點怎麼一路推到底、我實際寫的段落哪裡好哪裡要改,最後給一段示範和三題練習。
一、工作與職涯常考的 8 種題目
| 題目方向(中文轉述) | 常見題型 | 真正的爭點 |
|---|---|---|
| 越來越多人選擇自己創業或接案,原因是什麼?缺點又是什麼(我寫過) | Two questions | 自由 vs 風險 |
| 工作週應該縮短、週末應該變長(我寫過,Cam19-2) | Agree / Disagree | 效率與身心 vs 成本與產能 |
| 遇到不滿意的工作或缺錢,該接受還是努力改善(我寫過,Cam14-1) | Discuss both views | 安穩 vs 進步 |
| 工作、學校和生活中,競爭好還是合作好(我寫過,Cam19-1) | Discuss both views | 個人潛能 vs 團隊成果 |
| 工作滿意度比工作穩定更重要嗎 | Agree / Disagree | 內在動機 vs 經濟安全 |
| 一輩子待同一家公司,還是經常換工作 | Discuss both views | 年資升遷 vs 經驗人脈 |
| 在家工作的優點是否大於缺點 | Outweigh | 彈性 vs 溝通與界線 |
| 某些職業(如藝人、運動員)收入過高是否合理 | Agree / Two questions | 市場價格 vs 社會貢獻 |
這八題背後其實只有兩條主軸,我寫工作題時會先決定論點落在哪一條:
| 主軸 | 一端 | 另一端 | 常用片語 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 錢與安全 | 穩定收入、年資、福利 | 自由、彈性、成就感 | job security / a steady income ↔ autonomy / a sense of achievement |
| 個人與群體 | 個人潛能、升遷、競爭 | 團隊、歸屬感、合作 | reach one’s full potential ↔ a sense of belonging / collective goals |
二、正反論點庫:8 條工作題邏輯鏈

A. 滿意度 vs 穩定性
支持滿意度論點 1|喜歡自己的工作,才會長期投入
Point → 工作滿意度比穩定更重要,因為它決定一個人能不能長期做好一份工作。
解釋 → 一份穩定但讓人厭煩的工作,會讓人只做最低限度的事;長期下來不只表現平平,也會影響身心狀態。反過來,覺得工作有意義的人比較願意主動學習,表現提升後,穩定和升遷反而跟著來。
例子 → 假設性例子:兩位同時進公司的工程師,一位只是為了穩定,下班就不碰專業;另一位真心喜歡寫程式,常常自學新技術,三年後被指派帶新專案的通常是後者。
Employees who find their work meaningful are more willing to improve their skills, and this improvement often brings the security that others seek directly.
支持穩定性論點 2|穩定收入是規劃人生的前提
Point → 對多數人來說,工作穩定比滿意度更重要,因為生活規劃需要可預期的收入。
解釋 → 房租或房貸、孩子的教育費、照顧長輩的開銷,都是每個月固定要付的錢;收入不穩定時,人很難做長期決定,壓力也會從工作延伸到家庭。滿意度固然重要,但它建立在基本生活無虞之上。
例子 → 假設性例子:一位接案設計師某個月收入很高,下個月卻幾乎沒有案子,這樣的波動讓他不敢申請房貸,也不敢計畫生小孩。
A stable income allows people to make long-term commitments, such as buying a home or starting a family, which are difficult when earnings fluctuate.
支持換工作論點 3|換環境能累積人脈與多元經驗
Point → 經常換工作的好處是能接觸不同的人和挑戰,累積更廣的經驗。
解釋 → 待在同一家公司,學到的流程和人脈都侷限在那個環境;換到新公司要重新適應,雖然辛苦,但會逼人學新技能,也會認識不同產業的人,這些都是之後轉職或升遷的資本。
例子 → 反方可以用年資:待得久的人比較容易升主管、薪水隨年資增加。寫 Both views 時,這兩點剛好可以對照。
Changing jobs exposes people to new challenges and new networks, both of which can be valuable assets later in their careers.
B. 自僱與創業
自僱的原因論點 4|彈性時間與自主權
Point → 很多人選擇自僱,是因為可以自己決定工作時間和方式。
解釋 → 受僱者的班表由公司決定,想多陪家人或發展興趣都要配合公司;自僱者可以把工作排在自己效率最好的時段,也能自己決定接什麼案子,這種掌控感本身就是一種吸引力。
例子 → 我在自僱作文裡寫的是:傳統工作班表固定,自己經營事業則有彈性時間,可以多陪家人。
Being self-employed allows people to organise their working hours around their families and personal interests, rather than around a fixed company schedule.
自僱的缺點論點 5|收入不穩定,抵抗外部衝擊的能力弱
Point → 自僱最大的缺點是風險:收入不穩,遇到外部衝擊時也很難撐下去。
解釋 → 上班族有固定薪水、勞健保和公司當緩衝;自僱者的收入取決於當月的客戶和訂單,一旦景氣變差或發生突發事件,沒有資金或股東支援就可能直接停業。
例子 → 我在自僱作文裡用的是 COVID-19:疫情期間很多中小企業因為缺乏資金撐不過去。這個例子大家都知道,也直接對應「外部衝擊」。
Unlike employees, self-employed people have no regular salary to fall back on, so an external shock such as a pandemic can force them out of business.
C. 工時、競爭與合作
支持縮短工時論點 6|休息足夠,效率反而更高
Point → 縮短工作週可以提高效率,因為疲勞的人產能會下降。
解釋 → 工時拉長不等於產出增加:連續工作好幾天後,專注力和判斷力都會變差,出錯率上升;如果多一天休息,員工回到工作崗位時精神較好,同樣的工作可以在更短時間內完成。
例子 → 我在縮短工時那篇寫的是:多數人一天工作八小時後產能就會下降,更不用說連續五天。也可以用假設性例子:某公司試行四天工作制後,請假天數減少、專案準時完成的比例提高。
Well-rested employees tend to make fewer mistakes and work more efficiently, so a shorter week does not necessarily mean lower output.
反對縮短工時論點 7|不是每個行業都能少上一天班
Point → 縮短工時並不適用所有產業,可能提高成本或降低服務品質。
解釋 → 醫院、交通、零售這類需要持續有人值班的行業,少一天班就要多請人補位,人事成本會上升;如果不補人,就可能出現服務中斷或排隊時間變長,最後由消費者承擔。
例子 → 假設性例子:一間診所若改成每週只開四天,病人只能擠在剩下的時間看診,等候時間變長。
In sectors such as healthcare and transport, a shorter week would either require more staff or reduce the service available to the public.
支持合作論點 8|合作能整合多元觀點,也帶來歸屬感
Point → 合作比競爭更有益,因為團隊能整合不同背景的想法。
解釋 → 一個人的知識和視角有限;不同專長的人一起討論時,可以互相補足盲點,做出一個人做不到的成果。此外,被團隊接納的感覺能提升心理健康,讓人更願意長期投入。
例子 → 我在競爭與合作那篇寫的是:團隊做專案時,不同科系的人帶來不同觀點,讓成果更完整;與同學、同事合作也能帶來歸屬感。
When people from different backgrounds work together, they can cover each other’s blind spots and produce results that no individual could achieve alone.
這 8 條論點不是只能用在一題。我把它們和常考題目對起來,看到新題目時先查這張表,通常 3 分鐘內就能決定兩個主體段要寫什麼:
| 論點 | 可以用在哪些題目 | 要換成什麼角度 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 滿意度帶來投入 | 滿意度 vs 穩定、薪水是否最重要、年輕人常換工作 | 強調長期表現與學習動機 |
| 2 穩定收入 | 滿意度 vs 穩定、自僱缺點、接受困境 | 強調家庭責任與長期規劃 |
| 3 換工作累積經驗 | 同一家公司 vs 換工作、年輕人常換工作 | 強調人脈與可轉移技能 |
| 4、5 自僱彈性與風險 | 自僱、在家工作、接案經濟 | 彈性對應自由,風險對應收入 |
| 6、7 工時與效率 | 縮短工時、在家工作、加班文化 | 一邊寫員工效率,一邊寫產業成本 |
| 8 合作與歸屬感 | 競爭 vs 合作、團隊運動、在家工作的缺點 | 寫在家工作時反過來用:缺乏歸屬感 |
三、核心詞彙與搭配詞:寫工作題一定會用到的字
只挑上面論點會用到的搭配,附上我作文裡的原句。完整的求職、創業、gap year 單字表請看主題單字(上)。
| 搭配詞 | 我作文裡的原句(出處) | 更自然/升級寫法 |
|---|---|---|
| run one’s own business | a number of people run their own businesses instead of working for corporations(自僱) | 很自然,可直接用 |
| a flexible schedule | they can undoubtedly have flexiable schedule(自僱) | a flexible schedule(拼字+冠詞) |
| a sense of achievement | The second factor is related to a sense of achievement(自僱) | 可再補一句說明「成就感從哪裡來」 |
| external shocks | it is easy for companies to be influenced by external shock(自僱) | vulnerable to external shocks |
| small and medium-sized enterprises | most of small and median corporations do have ability to overcome…(自僱) | most small and medium-sized enterprises did not have the ability(原句漏了 not,意思相反) |
| productivity / efficiency | it increases workers productivity and efficiency(縮短工時) | workers’ productivity(所有格) |
| escape from a hectic schedule | they can escape from their hectic schedule in their daily life(縮短工時) | take a break from their hectic routine |
| reach one’s full potential | competition can foster a person’s biggest potential(競爭合作) | help people reach their full potential |
| a sense of belonging | cooperation boosts a sense of belonging for every member in a team(競爭合作) | for every member of a team |
| higher compensation | those individuals can have better jobs with higher compensation(接受或改善) | 很自然,可直接用 |
| job security | (我沒在這幾篇用過,補充) | value job security over job satisfaction |
| burnout | (我沒在這幾篇用過,補充) | long hours can lead to burnout:縮短工時題必備 |
| autonomy | (我沒在這幾篇用過,補充) | enjoy greater autonomy:自僱、在家工作題好用 |
四、我的實戰段落拆解:6 分到 7.5 分差在哪
以下段落都是送出批改的原始版本,未修改;分析是我對照公開評分標準自己整理的。
拆解 1|接受困境還是改善(Cam14-1,Both views):6 分,段落立場自相矛盾
原文:第一個主體段(節錄前半)
An array of factors may contribute to why accepting a bad situation seems rather disadvantageous. First and foremost, it is readily apparent that the life after choosing the poorer situation will be easier because of lower competitiveness. For example, since fewer workers want to compete for those occupations with fewer salary, people who choose those jobs may not need to face comparisons and competitions with others. Secondly, people who choose those bad situations sometimes have more leisure time, providing feasible schedule to individuals.
這篇的主要問題:主題句說接受困境「相當不利」(disadvantageous),但後面兩個理由(生活比較輕鬆、空閒時間比較多)其實都是接受困境的好處。讀者讀完主題句,接著讀到的卻是相反方向的內容,立場就亂了。再加上開頭把題目改寫成「優點是否多於缺點」,等於把 Both views 寫成了優缺點題。
這就是 Task Response 和 Coherence 都只有 6 的原因:論點本身不差,但它們沒有被放在正確的框架裡。
改寫示範(主題句與第一個理由)
Some people believe that accepting a difficult situation is the wiser choice. First, it can protect people from unnecessary stress, because constantly competing for better positions is exhausting. For example, an employee who stays in a modest but secure job may have more time for family and personal interests.
只要把主題句改成「有些人認為接受比較明智」,後面的內容就全部順了。完整分析在接受困境還是改善 6 分範文。
拆解 2|自僱(Two questions):兩題都回答到,TR 7-8
原文:缺點段
However, being self-employed sometimes seems to be disadvantageous. First and foremost, it is readily apparent that the salary those people earn is not stable. To put it another way, since those self-employed people do not have enough sources of stakeholders or suppliers, they sometimes do not have stable money or revenue to pay for themselves. Secondly, running their own business is risky, since it is easy for companies to be influenced by external shock. The COVID-19, which influenced worldwide, is a good example of this matter. As a result of a lack of funding or shareholders, most of small and median corporations do have ability to overcome the difficulties when the pandemic happened.
好在哪:Two questions 題最怕只回答一題,這篇原因一段、缺點一段,兩題都直接回答。缺點段的兩個理由也有分工:一個講平時(收入不穩),一個講危機(外部衝擊),不會重複。
可以改的地方:
- 最後一句 do have ability 漏了 not,時態也應該是過去式,意思整個顛倒。這種錯在考場上只能靠留兩分鐘檢查抓出來。
- sources of stakeholders or suppliers 用字不精準。收入不穩的原因其實是「客戶和訂單不固定」,寫 a steady flow of clients 更準確。
- The COVID-19 不加 the;which influenced worldwide 改成 which affected the whole world。
改寫示範(缺點段核心句)
To begin with, the income of self-employed people is often unpredictable. Since they depend on a steady flow of clients rather than a fixed salary, a quiet month can leave them unable to cover their basic expenses. Secondly, small businesses are particularly vulnerable to external shocks. During the COVID-19 pandemic, for example, many small and medium-sized enterprises did not have enough savings or investors to survive several months of closure, and were forced to shut down.
改寫後兩個理由都有「原因 → 結果」:沒有固定薪水 → 淡季付不出基本開銷;沒有資金緩衝 → 疫情時被迫停業。原本的 do have ability 也改成了正確的否定句。
拆解 3|縮短工時(Cam19-2,Agree):CC 8 的段落長什麼樣
原文:第二個主體段
Another factor supporting my opinion is that it enhances workers’ mental well-being. If workers enable to spend quality holiday traveling or getting closer to nature, there is no denying that they can escape from their hectic schedule in their daily life, which increases their mental health. In other words, longer weekend grants workers opportunities to engage in some outdoor activities, providing unique chances to release their pressure and keeping away from mental illness like depression. Take myself as an illustration If I wish to travel to the southern part of Taiwan, I need to have at least three day-offs due to the long distance; therefore, having longer weekend enables me to plan a travel to those far cities instead of just hanging out in my neighborhood, where does not have any natural landscape or spectacular architecture.
好在哪:這段的 Coherence 是 8,原因是每一句都在往前推:更長的假期 → 能去旅行、親近自然 → 釋放壓力 → 遠離憂鬱 → 用自己的例子證明「三天假才去得了南部」。例子是真實、具體、而且跟論點完全對應的。
可以改的地方:If workers enable to 應為 are able to;Take myself as an illustration 後面少了句號;day-offs 應為 days off;where does not have 應改為 which does not have。內容到位,扣分都在小地方。
完整分析在縮短工時 7 分範文。
拆解 4|競爭還是合作(Cam19-1,Both views):7.5 分的對方觀點段
原文:對方觀點段
However, the option of cooperating with each other is attractive for some reason. First and foremost, cooperating together combines various ideas, providing better outcomes and diverse thoughts. For instance, when a team conducts some project together, their discussion includes different topics and views from a wide range of majors, which can definitely make the project more special and well-established. Furthermore, cooperation boosts a sense of belonging for every member in a team, further enhancing mental well-being. By cooperating with classmates or colleagues, individuals find that they are part of their teams, which lowers the possibility of getting mental illness like depression.
好在哪:這是我寫 Both views 時最滿意的一段「對方觀點」。很多人寫對方觀點時會寫得很短、很敷衍,這段卻跟自己支持的那段一樣完整:兩個理由、各有解釋與例子。開頭的 However 和主題句清楚標示「現在換到另一邊」,和拆解 1 那篇形成強烈對比。
可以改的地方:cooperating together 語意重複(cooperate 本身就有一起的意思);more special and well-established 用字模糊,改成 more creative and thorough 更貼切;for some reason 應為 for some reasons,或改成 for several reasons。
五、示範:工作滿意度 vs 工作穩定
下面是我新寫的一段示範,題目方向是「工作滿意度是否比工作穩定更重要」,立場是部分同意:滿意度重要,但前提是基本生活穩定。這種「有條件的立場」在工作題很好用,因為它很真實,也容易寫出深度。
示範(主體段,約 130 字)
[Point] Admittedly, job satisfaction matters, but I believe it only becomes a priority once a basic level of security has been achieved. [解釋] People who are worried about paying their rent or supporting their parents cannot afford to leave a stable position simply because the work is uninspiring. [延伸] For them, a predictable salary is what makes long-term plans, such as buying a home or raising children, possible at all. [例子] For example, a young graduate with student loans may reasonably accept a routine office job for several years, and only later move to a more fulfilling but less secure career. [收尾] In other words, security and satisfaction are not opposites; for most people, the first is the foundation that allows them to pursue the second.
這段的關鍵在最後一句:它沒有只是重複立場,而是把兩個概念的關係講清楚(穩定是追求滿意度的基礎)。考官看到的不只是「我同意」,而是你怎麼想這件事。
| 段落 | 內容(示範大綱) |
|---|---|
| 開頭 | 改寫題目:有人認為滿意度比穩定重要。立場:部分同意,滿意度重要,但建立在基本穩定之上。 |
| 主體一 | 滿意度重要的理由:喜歡工作才會長期投入、表現提升(論點 1)。 |
| 主體二 | 穩定是前提:上面那段示範(論點 2 的延伸)。 |
| 結論 | 兩者不是對立:先求穩定,再逐步追求滿意度。 |
六、工作題容易寫錯的地方
| 容易錯的地方 | 為什麼錯 | 怎麼改 |
|---|---|---|
| 主題句和段落內容方向相反 | 拆解 1 的問題:說「不利」卻寫好處 | 寫完每段後回頭讀主題句,確認同一個方向 |
| 把 Both views 寫成優缺點題 | 題目問兩種觀點,不是優缺點 | 開頭改寫題目時保留「有些人認為…其他人認為…」 |
| job / work 混用 | job 可數(一份工作),work 不可數(工作這件事) | find a job、look for work;不要寫 a work |
| salary 和 income、wage 不分 | salary 月薪制,wage 時薪或週薪,income 泛指收入 | 自僱者用 income,不用 salary |
| day-offs | 固定說法是 days off | take three days off |
| staff 加 s | staff 指全體員工時通常不加 s | hire more staff;一位員工是 a staff member |
| 只寫員工的角度 | 縮短工時、在家工作題也要考慮雇主和社會 | 至少一個論點寫公司成本或社會影響 |
| 關鍵句漏 not | 自僱那篇 do have ability 意思相反 | 最後兩分鐘專門檢查否定句與時態 |
七、練習題(附參考大綱)
Practice 1. More and more employees are working from home. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?
點我看參考大綱
優點:①省下通勤時間,員工有更多時間休息與陪家人 ②公司可以縮小辦公室,降低租金成本。
缺點:①溝通變慢,新人難以學習 ②工作與生活界線模糊,容易過勞(burnout)。
秤重句:The communication problems can be reduced with regular online meetings, whereas the time saved on commuting is a benefit that cannot be achieved in any other way.
Practice 2. Some people think that a high salary is the most important factor when choosing a job. Others believe that other factors are more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
點我看參考大綱
我方(其他因素):①工作環境與同事關係影響身心健康 ②學習與升遷機會決定長期收入,短期高薪不一定划算。
例子:假設性例子:一份起薪較高但沒有培訓的工作,五年後的薪水可能被一份起薪低但有完整訓練的工作超越。
小心:對方觀點段要和自己那段一樣完整(參考拆解 4)。
Practice 3. Nowadays, many young people change jobs frequently. Why is this happening? Is this a positive or negative development?
點我看參考大綱
好壞:(示範)整體是正面發展:累積多元經驗與人脈(論點 3);但太頻繁可能讓雇主懷疑穩定度。
注意:Two questions 題要兩題都回答,第二題要明確寫出 positive 或 negative,不要只寫「各有利弊」。
延伸閱讀
- 【雅思寫作|寫作語言】Task 2 主題單字(上):科技、環境、教育與工作
- 【雅思寫作|分數範文】接受困境還是改善?6 分範文
- 【雅思寫作|分數範文】該不該縮短工時?7 分範文
- 【雅思寫作|分數範文】競爭還是合作?7.5 分範文
- 【雅思寫作|大作文架構】Two-question 題型怎麼寫?
- 【雅思寫作|大作文架構】Discuss both views 題型怎麼寫?
- IELTS 備考筆記總覽
IELTS 寫作攻略導覽 · 主題攻略(第 2 / 10 篇)
← 上一篇:教育與學習:主修、跨領域學習、實務技能
下一篇 →:科技與媒體:手機、人工智慧、自動化與面對面溝通
✦ Target Your Future
有些日子,明明練了很久,成績卻還停在原地。希望這篇筆記能讓你知道,備考路上遇到挫折並不孤單。一次次重聽的錄音、改過的作文、終於敢說出口的句子,都是你已經走過的路。
把這些經驗寫下來,是想陪下一個正在準備的人少繞一點路。你不必照著我的方法前進,只需要慢慢找到適合自己的節奏。累的時候可以休息,再回來做今天能完成的一小步。
願你最後帶走的,不只是成績單上的數字,還有更相信自己、敢往世界走近一點的勇氣。
— Ting
← 回到 IELTS 備考筆記
Leave a Reply